Home About Us Supporters Interact Courses Materials Scibelpedia
Have you got opinions about science and faith? Or burning questions that you want to get answered? Then we can help - say what you think on our discussion boards, or ask questions to our team of experts.
"It's sometimes thought that science and faith conflict, in fact they don't, you can put the two together."
Sir John Houghton, Former Professor of Atmospheric Physics, University of Oxford, CEO of the Met Office
Discussion Forum

A Message Board, Guestbook, or Poll hosted for your website.
Register  | Login  |   | New Posts  | Chat
 
Forums > Everything Else > Why should the universe have the fundamental properties that it has?
 
Username:  
Password:  
 
   
 


Thread Tools  | Search This Thread 
Reply
 
Author Comment
 
Explorer
Registered: 06/13/08
Posts: 2

    06/13/08 at 01:09 AM
  Reply with quote#1

This question "Is there any evidence of God?" on the home page, and the supplementary question above in this thread topic, prompted me to post this:

There is one possible answer to that question. It can be explained by the theory of the "Multiverse", put forward as suggested in the text, by Martin Rees. It is a highly debatable point that this theory is any less believable than the belief in the existence God, as there is some evidence to suggest that this may indeed be possible, and answer some of the effects that we observe in our universe.

The theory goes:

Instead of a single universe containing one set of physical properties, there could be an infinite number of parallel universes with different sets of physical properties. It follows then, that at least one of those universes will have the physical properties that eventually generate sentient beings that ponder on their own origins.

This pushes the divine causal effect back another step, back to before, if there ever was a "before", the Big Bang.

This answer is based on two scientific theories, to which there is some supporting evidence. The danger of attempting to reconcile religion with scientific theory, is that the latter never stands still, and is reminiscent of the late Professor Coulson's "God of Gaps" criticism of Christians and other religious groups, who try to fill a temporary absence of objective knowledge, with God.

Explorer
Registered: 06/13/08
Posts: 2

    06/23/08 at 03:25 PM
  Reply with quote#2

Forty three veiwings but no responses! Why?
Previous Thread | Next Thread
Reply

  Bookmarks  
Digg Diggdel.icio.us del.icio.usStumbleUpon StumbleUponGoogle Google



Ask Questions
Coming soon...
Alternatively, take a look at our list of hot questions with answers that we wrote already.
Links
There are other sites on the web that have great materials about science and Christianity - take a look at our list, and feel free to suggest sites that we haven’t listed yet. Visit our links page.
A member of the Gospel Communications Network. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 Scibel